all cracks 4 soft
cracks db
search cracks
download rapidshare files
free download cracks
free cracks 4 all
get serials
dola dll warez
download keygen
Watchdog Milwaukee » Your Progressive Source for Local Opinions and Insightful Commentary
Het downloaden van klingeltöne, Download von klingeltöne, Het downloaden van klingeltöne, Descargar tonos, Téléchargez des sonneries, scarica suonerie, Beltonen downloaden, Nedlasting av ringetoner, Download ringtones

The Millennial Work Ethic

As a guy who keeps a fair amount of people employed, I’m often amused at what the public perceives as a varying generational work ethic, and what is reality. So here’s what I’ve found to be the reality.

Myth #1: Millennials are lazy
Employers who assume this stereotype do so at their own peril and at the cost of their customers. Millennials can be just as effective as other generations were at that age. With age (sometimes) comes wisdom, but the baby boomers who are the employers of today, conveniently forget that the generation before them thought they were a bunch of pot smoking hippies who would never amount to anything.

Myth #2: Millennials will only accept high paying jobs
If anything, the opposite is true. Many millennials start off working low paying jobs in the service industry just as many baby boomers did. The thing is that a baby boomer may have made $7 an hour in their youth, but millennials are still working at jobs making right around $7 an hour 30 years later. In 1984, I made $7.70 an hour as a part time mail clerk. Adjusted for inflation, today that would be $17.63. Few of these millennials who are college now are making anywhere near that wage.

Myth #3: Millennials don’t want to have to travel to work
Due to wages that are lower, relative to what baby boomers enjoyed, millennials have a harder time accessing jobs which are increasingly being developed in the suburbs and even the exurbs which is close to where many baby boomer employers live. In many cases, mass transit does not serve those areas or mass transit is increasingly limited. Public investment in mass transit has dropped dramatically and as such, bus lines have been cut and scaled back. Bus lines that used to drop workers near the entrances of industrial or factory jobs that were located on major streets and thoroughfares now either don’t serve the areas where the jobs are or they skirt the edges of these business parks.

Myth #4: Millennials aren’t willing to commit to their job
If treated fairly and given the opportunity to make a respectable wage, millennials will have as much commitment to their employer as their employer has to them. Millennials are realistic as they have seen their parents lose their jobs and they have grown up watching their elders succeed by moving to different jobs.

Myth #5: Millennials want everything now
Millennials have grown up in households and have seen their parents struggle. They understand that a corporate downsizing can happen at anytime and are willing to commit if their is adequate commitment from their employer as well.

In short, millennials are more similar to baby boomers than boomers would like to admit. They are the children of boomers and Gen X’ers, but they deal with the same sort of workplace age discrimination that previous generations did.

If anything, millennials put a higher value on quality of life. Long hours for little pay and no benefits are not attractive to millennials. They are willing to put in long hours with the promise of an end in sight, but they must see a tangible, non-distant benefit. Employers who wish to simply grind out 20 years of work from a millennial without giving their millennial employees a real opportunity to achieve the American Dream will be disappointed. But then again, the employer who wants those things also has to understand that they had the same aspirations at that age.


Journal-Sentinel Gets It Wrong on the TKE Fraternity Story

Scandalous accusations dominated the headlines this fall — headlines that, as it turns out, were based on innuendo instead of fact. The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel insinuated that the Tau Kappa Epsilon (TKE) fraternity at the UW-Milwaukee campus was spiking the drinks of female party guests with a date rape drug. In the end, the accusations proved false, but the Journal-Sentinel had their story.

The media exploded when an unnamed person used their Facebook page to suggest that the Teke’s (as TKE members are known) may have included a date rape drug in drinks some of these girls had.

Media Innuendo Drives Story
So why did the Journal-Sentinel decide to run with this story? It’s because, “College Students Get Drunk at Fraternity House” wouldn’t have shocked anyone and probably wouldn’t have sold any more papers. On the other hand, Police probe whether UWM fraternity members put drugs in party drinks (published September 18, 2014) brought national attention.

Amateur Drinkers Don’t Know Their Own Limits
The real story is much simpler. In their first month of college and in the first year that most of these young people become legal adults, they had access to parties where other adults drink alcoholic beverages. In all likelihood, September was their first month of freedom away from their parents vigilant eyes. As amateurs, these young adults drank more than they should have. One of the students stated they had “weird feeling and sensation prior to blacking out.”

And what happens when you drink two, or in a few cases almost three times the legal limit of alcohol? Well you get sick and sometimes black out, or at least many people do. If you’re smart, you don’t do it again to the same degree. But again, many of these young people were in their first month of college.

Is it menacing? Well it can certainly be messy, and it is illegal to provide alcohol to these adults who have not yet reached the age of 21 ever since the law was changed in 1984 in a law passed by Congress and signed by the most famous Teke of all time, the late-President Ronald Reagan.

So how would an amateur at drinking explain their first night of excess? It’s reasonable to say that they would have had a “weird feeling and sensation prior to blacking out.”

Over-reaching Prosecution and Immaturity
Now the story would have been interesting enough, but since the police had already busted the fraternity for providing alcohol to minors, they had reasonable cause to search the house. The story was made to look even more sinister when it turned out that the fraternity President had two different strains of marijuana, in separate baggies, in his locked room. (Having a locked bedroom is common for college students whether they live with other students off campus or in the dorms.) Different strains of marijuana have different effects but since they were in separate bags, the district attorney has since charged him with maintaining a drug house.

The Teke President was reported as being 28 years old by the Journal-Sentinel without context. What wasn’t reported is that he served several tours of duty and afterwards went onto college.

To make matters worse, two days after the party he turned 28 years old which is old for a college student unless, like many college students these days, they served in the military. The media insinuation was that this was a guy who was old for a college student, taking advantage of young students. For this story we were not able to confirm whether or not he was in the military but we asked the question and was told by several students that knew him that he was responsible for bringing up the average G.P.A. of the entire fraternity. And while his scholastic prowess did not make news reports, his age did.

This young man also had the prescription drug Adderall, commonly known on college campuses as the “study drug” due to the singular focus that it gives students extreme focus on the task at hand, was found in his room. He has since been charged with possessing an illegally obtained prescription, a misdemeanor offense.

Now it’s all well and good to point to a college student who clearly exceeded the boundaries of common sense, but it’s another thing to indict an entire fraternity. Unfortunately, that’s what has happened here.

In reaction to the media frenzy, UWM suspended their ties to TKE and the fraternity’s own national organization abandoned them by pulling their charter, making them just another group of students living near campus.

Rolling Stone Showed Journalistic Integrity, the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel Abandoned it
Last month, Rolling Stone Magazine published an article alleging rape by several University of Virginia’s Phi Kappa Psi fraternity members. The story enflamed public opinion against Phi Kappa Psi who despite extreme public pressure and condemnation, remained steadfast, insisting in their innocence. When questions arose and the source changed her story about facts surrounding the alleged event, Rolling Stone issued a post-publication statement indicating such. Yes, they admitted that they might have been wrong.

The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel took another approach. Although someone on Facebook had claimed that the Teke’s had spiked drinks with a date rape drug, no trace of drugs were found in the system of the girls who were tested. The Journal-Sentinel stayed steadfast in their story by not issuing a correction, nor even a post-publication statement indicating that the accusations they had reported were, in fact, wrong.

Tau Kappa Epsilon’s Milwaukee chapter holds a fundraiser for a local food bank. This is in keeping with one of their key principles upon which their brotherhood is based upon — charity

Lives Changed, Dreams Realigned
Young men join a fraternity with dreams of being part of something larger and taking a leadership role in their own organization. The UWM Teke’s have been stripped of the traditional understanding of greek letter organizations. Although they joined an organization that has initiated over a quarter million students, they may never become a TKE alumni. Most fraternities operate under moral codes and principles. These young men should continue to live by whatever oaths they took at their membership ceremonies.

Although both the media and the district attorneys office have already symbolically convicted the members of TKE, we here at Watchdog Milwaukee hope that these young men continue to stay together and operate as a local fraternity even as their national has suspended activities with these young men. Although their university has abandoned them, they owe it to each other to continue to spend time together and build their bonds of brotherhood.

Links and Sources:
National Minimum Drinking Age Act – Source: Wikipedia
Police probe whether UWM fraternity members put drugs in party drinks
Wisconsin Court System – Circuit Court Access
TKE, Tau Kappa Epsilon National Fraternity
The Washington Post
Rolling Stone Magazine’s story noted above

Other articles of interest:
UWM Official Found a Key Allegation into TKE Fraternity Appeared False, Motion Says


Jim McGuigan is a UW-Milwaukee alumni who, during his college years was a member of a local fraternity which disbanded in approximately 2009. He continues to spend time with his old fraternity members, 30 years later.


Ament, Milwaukee County’s “Tight-Wad Liberal” Dies at 76

Tom Ament was as intense a political animal as they come. He was no-nonsense and stubborn. Once he embraced an idea or a policy, he was a true believer. He called himself a “tight-wad liberal” and worked hard to live up to that label.

His career was peppered with successes and in classic Ament style, ended at least partly on his terms.

Ament looked at the long game in politics. He surrounded himself with like-minded souls — pushed, lobbied and strategised in ways that he could accomplish more good than any other Milwaukee County Executive has.

Without Tom Ament, the Calatrava Art Museum would not have been built. The Milwaukee Brewers would be gone since it was Ament who championed the stadium sales tax which allowed Miller Park to be built. Parts of Milwaukee County would have been sold off, or at least been so underfunded as to languish and decay. Without Ament, the Milwaukee Public Museum would likely still be a hulk of a building in suffering disrepair instead of the destination that it is today.

Tom Ament left a lasting legacy of building effective public-private partnerships which can maintain and even improve services and access without increasing taxes to fund those facilities and programs. At his heart, Ament was proud to wear the label “tight-wad”.

Ament understood how County government worked better than anyone I have ever known. He understood the legislative side, having served as a County Supervisor as well as having been elected by his colleagues to be the Board Chairman. He understood the dynamics between the County Executive, which was effectively created to be similar to an administrative position, and how he could work with, or in some cases use, the Board to advance his agenda.

There was never a time, in the 6 years that I served with Ament, that people had any delusion that he wouldn’t strong-arm his way into getting what he wanted. Ament wanted you to believe that he was the boss. He knew how to get things done and if you crossed him there would be consequences. More than once, I was on the receiving end of his wrath. But I was not phased and as we got to know each other, we developed a mutual respect, even if we didn’t always agree.

Charm and charisma came out of Tom in social situations. He had his go-to stories that he would generously share. They were his war stories. He would flash a wry grin and share some sage wisdom, revel in old victories, and recount the bravado of other political folk he had run across over the decades.

While there are those that would wish to define Ament by the successes of his political adversaries at the end of his career, they miss the point and do not have a full understanding of his life. Although they won a battle with smear tactics, Ament was vindicated by a County lawsuit which in the end, financially benefited those same adversaries. The county bankrolled the settlement based on what Ament had said all along, and Ament was right.

Perhaps that is the epitaph that Ament would be most proud of.


Why the JS will Support Walker Despite Email Scandal

For years, the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel has endorsed Scott Walker in his political races. Despite unanswered questions and ethical lapses, Milwaukee’s only daily newspaper has shown the formerly obscure State Assembly Rep. and unusual amount of gentleness. At campaign time, they have given him the benefit of the doubt in nearly all instances.

Walker is politically smart and has benefited from people underestimating him through his entire career. He has the ability to evade questions like no other politician. When asked a succinct question about scandals, inconsistencies, or problems in his own governing, he has aptly taken the time that a reporter normally allots for answering to push yet another agenda item or to claim success in areas where he has failed.

If pressed on those items and issues where he simply makes up his own facts and statistics, he will simply restate the fiction or move on to claim success on another issue, regardless of whether there was truly a success or a failure. The most interesting part about this is not about Walker himself — it is about how the media lets him get away with it under the guise of being impartial, or in some cases, “fair and balanced”.

Walker has shown himself to be amazingly talented in his handling of televised media — especially live television. He has an understanding that on live television, reporters have a finite amount of time for their segments and if he doesn’t want to answer a question, he chews up all of a reporters time without answering the question or by deflecting the question. He has shown an unwavering focus on restating his talking points and if he sits down with a reporter he controls the interview.

Team Walker has covered all the bases. They have been especially adept at making sure that if their candidate is tainted, that the opposition will have plenty of taint, or at least doubt, in the mind of the voter. Even in the Journal-Sentinel screen capture to the right (larger version here), you’ll notice that Team Walker made sure to get a negative campaign ad attached to the Journal-Sentinel article and that ad has a headline that is even larger than the Journal-Sentinel headline. ‘Which one is the most important story’ is the question that Team Walker hopes to stick in the minds of voters.

Going forward, it is difficult to see a possibility that the JS will not endorse Walker. Their track record has been one of accommodation, not critical journalism. The media savvy that the incumbent Governor and his team have accumulated will serve him well, even if the email scandal escalates.


Milwaukee County Board Gets What They Deserved

In a rush to prove themselves ineffective an unable to act as a mature legislative body, the Milwaukee County Board has just earned themselves not only the wrath of a majority of the Republican legislature, but Governor Scott Walker as well. They proved that they just don’t get it.

Now I’m not at all willing to goose step to the drum of the tea party republicans who run our state. I find them to be short sighted and unable to understand that infrastructure should be fixed when it is cheap to borrow money to fix it. That doesn’t strike me as very bright and it’s not only no way to run a business, it’s no way to run a government. I find their desire to trip over their own feet to make corporations happy at the expense of the general welfare of the public (and real small businesses for that matter) to be, well, un-American.

But what I do understand, and this is a fact that evades a majority of the County Board, is that Milwaukee County is, by legislation, effectively a department of the state of Wisconsin. They may be elected to a local legislative body, but that does not mean that they should spend time beating the drum to things they cannot impact or change. Spending County dollars to lobby state legislators about things that do not directly affect County government is foolish. It is an exercise in futility, a waste of local property tax dollars and it is akin to poking a ferocious bear with a stick. Not smart.

When Governor Walker pushed through legislation that effectively decertified public unions, that was the law of the land. He has effectively won his fatwah against unions and that meant that local governments did not have to negotiate with a union that had no standing to negotiate. But it appears that that is exactly what Chairman Marina Dimitrijevic did. Why? Perhaps it was her philosophical belief that unions are a good thing and they ought not ignore the folks who claimed to represent the employees. Is it a bad thing to talk with employees? Of course not. Employees can find inefficiencies that cannot always be found by management. Audits of these processes can often ferret out these problems and employees must be part of the process — but if a union is effectively defunct, and the order from the State is to not negotiate with decertified unions, then it was Dimitrijevic’s responsibility to follow state law.

Now I have a certain amount of healthy skepticism about this. I know some of the veteran County Supervisors and they seem to get it. Others do not. One of the Supervisors who seems to get it right every time is John Weishan. If Weishan says it, I have a fairly high degree of confidence in this ex-Marine. And with Weishan saying that Dimitrijevic must go, well, I tend to believe him.

My skepticism comes from the sources of the stories in the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. One such source is Rich Abelson. Abelson is the guy who is still collecting a paycheck from the decertified union, AFSCME District Council 48. Abelson is one of those guys who will say whatever helps Abelson. He lies and is a bully. Abelson said that Dimitrijevic was negotiating with him according to the Journal-Sentinel. If that’s true, and if it came out of Abelson’s mouth the truth of it is highly suspect, then Dimitrijevic made a bone head move.

Then there is the issue of the reporter. Steven Schulze is happy to write some pretty salacious sounding stories that have traces of truth, but when presented in his context have little truth to them. My recommendation to anyone who is interviewed by Schulze, whether you are a democrat, republican or non-partisan elected official – record the interview. Record the interview, inform him that you are recording the interview, and then podcast it if you find that he has taken liberties. Do not make the mistake of talking to Schulze about two different issues. He lacks the depth and understanding to separate issues. If he interviews you about an issue, do not let him stray to other issues. He will transpose facts in such a way that will make whoever the interviewee look bad and then the journalism community will give him an award for it.

So there you have it. Understanding what has happened, on this, the day that Governor Walker has signed legislation to single out the Milwaukee County Board for punitive legislative action, while giving the County Executive power than that position has ever had, provides the context to understand how it has happened.

But why has this happened? Historically there have been statesmen on that board who understood how things worked. Now they have almost no members who have been there for any length of time. Walker and his disciples made sure of that.

What they really need to do, and this will probably sound stupid to some, is reduce the sizes of the districts to the size of, say one of their neighboring communities — Waukesha. Do something simple. I hate to say this, but just compensate them as a part time board. Increase the amount of districts so that common people can actually talk to their Supervisor. Give them something like a buck a constituent, but only give them 10,000 constituents each. Do what so many of the other Wisconsin Counties have done — enlarge the board enough so that when people want to talk to their elected county Supervisor, they can. But don’t make the salaries enough so that they can live off of them. They don’t need to go to every Senior citizen and community meeting on the planet anyway. Bring them back into the private sector so they can be in touch with what the public is struggling with. You’re going to get some real goofballs on that board, but you’ll also get some real quality people.

Here’s the thing — whatever they want right now; it’s not going to happen. There is life after politics. If they make an effort to succeed, they will succeed. Things are not the same. Things cannot be the same. It’s a new day. Like it or not, deserved or undeserved, the rules have changed and so should the county board.


Appeasement is not Reform

The Milwaukee County Board is under seige. Attacked from talk radio, County Executive Abele, a former colleague of theirs turned State Representative, and the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, the County Board has pushed through a change that would reduce their pay to about $40,000.

That’s not reform — that’s appeasement.

Reducing the salary of the board is pure ignorance. If there are supervisors who don’t do their job they do not deserve to be paid. The work is there. Districts are now large and each Supervisor represents over 50,000 people. If they’re not dealing with constituent calls they should be doing park walks, constituent contacts, attending district meetings, working with their colleagues to draft common sense ordinances or eliminating ordinances that don’t make any sense anymore. There are roads to be evaluated, projects to be assessed and community outreach to be done.

If they’re too lazy to do those things, they don’t deserve to be in office. If they are doing those things, they are underpaid. It is not for the lazy ones to agree to a lower salary for the work horses.

I have strong views that a district deserves the representation they have. You vote for a person who doesn’t work hard for you, you forfeit the ability to complain about the effectiveness of the whole body. It’s just that simple. Now we have a County board that is going to make $40,000 next term. That may seem like a fair amount of money to some people, but will it really generate good people to do the work? In the private sector that would be an unequivocal “NO”. People who have real life experiences and put the time in to do research are not going to want to work for that salary. I’m sorry for those who are offended by this statement but I understand the marketplace. What will now happen is that if qualified people run for the job, they will only dedicate themselves to the job part time.

Studies have been done that show that the amount of money a family must make so they do not have money arguments is $70,000. I’m not saying to increase the salary that much. I am saying that there are people on that board who work hard and deserve to at very least maintain their salary of $50,000 per year. To the folks who don’t make that type of salary and look at it with jelousy, here’s a little hard lesson for you — make better decisions in your life. I worked as a County Supervisor for 6 years. At that time I enjoyed the challenges, the constituent work and interactions and working with my collegues. I would not have given that experience up willingly but I will say this — it was probably the best thing that ever happened to me. Yes, it make me more cynical, some would say seasoned. Yes, I follow my instincts now as a business owner more than I ever have. If it doesn’t feel right now, it doesn’t happen. I have no problem telling a customer that we are probably not a good match if I have a bad feeling about it.

But that’s not how the County Board is working.

It’s more like the blind leading the blind.

Amusement. That’s the best way to explain the clowning around that is happening on the County Board these days. They’re passing resolutions in support of things they have no control over. It’s a typical union tactic to coerce Supervisors to support things that have little hope of passing. In fact, it’s pretty much the M.O. of decertified AFSCME union chief Chris Abelson to push for legislation that the county board has no real hope of impacting. All of that pressure, for a lousy campaign donation of about $400 and the promise of campaign volunteers that never show up? Seriously? Are the county board members really that stupid?

Apparently yes. They voted in Supervisor Marina Dimitrijevic as chair. Marina, as she prefers to be known, is an approachable person who has made some smart decisions but has coupled them with facepalm moments. Reporters have said that she attempted to negotiate some sort of contract or agreement with a decertified union. Bonehead Abelson confirms this. Then she denied it. Now I’ll say this — Abeleson’s words are like the slimiest politician. He would sell out his own mother if he thought it would preserve himself and his own job. If he thinks it will give him some time in his job, collecting his salary, it will pass his weaselly pencil lips. Nothing that comes out of Abelson’s mouth should be viewed as true. If reporters are using his word as their primary source, they’re doing a great job honoring the Wisconsin tradition of former Senator Joe McCarthy and the yellow journalism that he was the beneficiary of.

But why has this happened? I shouldn’t even have to say this, but it is happening because there is not a culture of county legislative experience on the board. The great republican purge of 2002 made that possible. It’s the same thing for the County Executive. Poor little Chris Abele, a man with no private sector experience aside from running the family charity and deciding where to dole out an endowment here or there, won by buying the election. Then again, JFK was said to have bought his election so what does it matter?

It actually matters a fairly good amount since Abele has no experience working and playing well with others. I will admit that at first I thought it was just that he had poor communication skills but it goes deeper than that. Lacking any legislative experience, he has no respect for what goes into the legislative process. By eroding the power in another branch of government, his own power is increased. Is this a good thing? Probably not.

So what should have been done? Dimitrijevic should have stepped down as Chair. She was the one who allegedly negotiated against what was clearly the intention of the Governor sponsored Act 10. Since by statute, Counties are more like departments of the state than individual entities, she has to follow the rules. If she doesn’t, there are consequences.


Watchdog Milwaukee is a division of Midwest Deals LLC

Rodney's Adsense-Deluxe Add ons plugged in.
Using Yaletown Theme for Wordpress.

Progressive Webmasters of Wisconsin