<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charlie Sykes, Adulterer, Coward, Vindictive Republican shill</title>
	<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: appleton14</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-8963</link>
		<dc:creator>appleton14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 20:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-8963</guid>
		<description>'Tis wonderful that somebody that is pure as the clean driven snow and innocent as a lamb can expose that evil Charlie Sykes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Tis wonderful that somebody that is pure as the clean driven snow and innocent as a lamb can expose that evil Charlie Sykes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-8844</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-8844</guid>
		<description>I caught Charlie on his talk show a couple of weeks back when he was bashing the Catholic Church during a segment of his show. I also agree that this whole preist thing is repulsive. We catholics are paying for the mistakes of the church from years back which doesn't sit well. Does all the listeners now the goverment protects Unified Schools with a ceiling of $40,000 dollars in a law suit of this type, and when it comes to the Catholic Schools the ceiling is the limit,could this be why you only hear about the suits in the Catholic Schools. Where is the equality in that Charlie. I feel you owe a appologie to all us God fearing Christians of all faiths. Shame on you Charlie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I caught Charlie on his talk show a couple of weeks back when he was bashing the Catholic Church during a segment of his show. I also agree that this whole preist thing is repulsive. We catholics are paying for the mistakes of the church from years back which doesn&#8217;t sit well. Does all the listeners now the goverment protects Unified Schools with a ceiling of $40,000 dollars in a law suit of this type, and when it comes to the Catholic Schools the ceiling is the limit,could this be why you only hear about the suits in the Catholic Schools. Where is the equality in that Charlie. I feel you owe a appologie to all us God fearing Christians of all faiths. Shame on you Charlie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-8798</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 01:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-8798</guid>
		<description>One doesn't have to be perfect in all facets of life to speak on morality.  It seems to me that you are in a desperate attempt to take back what spotlight Mr. Sykes has taken control of.  You speak as if you have never made a mistake in your life.  You ask why the right doesn't care.  Well sometimes the MORAL thing to do is to forgive and forget.  This can be done by looking at what the man in question stands for as a whole.  I doubt very much that Mr. Sykes isn't passionate about his morality and that of others.  I have cultivated this belief from hearing him countless times on his radio show and that of others where he was a guest.  You attack his credibility for what gain?  So that you may be noted as Milwaukee's watch dog?  Attacking Mr. Sykes does nothing more than waste your time, as well as Milwaukee's time.  Focus in on something that will change the dynamics of our city in a positive way.  

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One doesn&#8217;t have to be perfect in all facets of life to speak on morality.  It seems to me that you are in a desperate attempt to take back what spotlight Mr. Sykes has taken control of.  You speak as if you have never made a mistake in your life.  You ask why the right doesn&#8217;t care.  Well sometimes the MORAL thing to do is to forgive and forget.  This can be done by looking at what the man in question stands for as a whole.  I doubt very much that Mr. Sykes isn&#8217;t passionate about his morality and that of others.  I have cultivated this belief from hearing him countless times on his radio show and that of others where he was a guest.  You attack his credibility for what gain?  So that you may be noted as Milwaukee&#8217;s watch dog?  Attacking Mr. Sykes does nothing more than waste your time, as well as Milwaukee&#8217;s time.  Focus in on something that will change the dynamics of our city in a positive way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-8787</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-8787</guid>
		<description>It's a good thing we have the morally pure looking out for us here in Milwaukee. Oh, and great choice in your Banner...JFK and Clinton particularly.

I guess what is galling is the insinuation that appearently to avoid being "hypocritical" one must simply have the absence of standards. Falling short of the ideals you believe in doesn't make you "hypocritical", it makes you human.

Furthermore, I don't think I've ever heard Charlie comdemn someone for being less than either 100% faithfull. Lying about their infidelity (IE clinton), certainly.

The real hypocrite is the who selectively attacks infedility depending on ones political views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good thing we have the morally pure looking out for us here in Milwaukee. Oh, and great choice in your Banner&#8230;JFK and Clinton particularly.</p>
<p>I guess what is galling is the insinuation that appearently to avoid being &#8220;hypocritical&#8221; one must simply have the absence of standards. Falling short of the ideals you believe in doesn&#8217;t make you &#8220;hypocritical&#8221;, it makes you human.</p>
<p>Furthermore, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever heard Charlie comdemn someone for being less than either 100% faithfull. Lying about their infidelity (IE clinton), certainly.</p>
<p>The real hypocrite is the who selectively attacks infedility depending on ones political views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deputy Insider</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-8628</link>
		<dc:creator>Deputy Insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-8628</guid>
		<description>Charlie, charlie, charlie, what would Dave say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie, charlie, charlie, what would Dave say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Z</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-8626</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-8626</guid>
		<description>A friend of mine told me that the only way to listen to Charlie is to remember  "This is his job".  So everytime he irritates me I put that quote fore front in my mind.  If you listen carefully to him, when he really gets upset, his voice rises and he you know that he feels he is losing his argument and changes the subject.  I guess the real thing that irritates me is that WTMJ defends his action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine told me that the only way to listen to Charlie is to remember  &#8220;This is his job&#8221;.  So everytime he irritates me I put that quote fore front in my mind.  If you listen carefully to him, when he really gets upset, his voice rises and he you know that he feels he is losing his argument and changes the subject.  I guess the real thing that irritates me is that WTMJ defends his action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom G</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-8521</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-8521</guid>
		<description>On the morning that the student in Florida was shocked by the campus security with a taser, Charlie Sykes and Jeff Wagner were talking about the incident.  Sykes laughingly called the student a "whiney-boy" in reaction to the student's cries.  Of course this was on top of the usual rhetoric of name-calling spew over the students views.  The word "kook" was used, etc.

To use unnecessary police brutality as a springboard to an ideological attack on the victim is the act of fascist bullies.

He makes me want to vomit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the morning that the student in Florida was shocked by the campus security with a taser, Charlie Sykes and Jeff Wagner were talking about the incident.  Sykes laughingly called the student a &#8220;whiney-boy&#8221; in reaction to the student&#8217;s cries.  Of course this was on top of the usual rhetoric of name-calling spew over the students views.  The word &#8220;kook&#8221; was used, etc.</p>
<p>To use unnecessary police brutality as a springboard to an ideological attack on the victim is the act of fascist bullies.</p>
<p>He makes me want to vomit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-667</guid>
		<description>This puts Charlie Sykes in the category of Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh. Remember the sexual harrassment by Bill O'Reilly and the drug abuse of Rush Limbaugh. These people preached "moral values" to other people and talk about the precious institution of marriage. But then they do immoral acts. They are all hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This puts Charlie Sykes in the category of Bill O&#8217;Reilly and Rush Limbaugh. Remember the sexual harrassment by Bill O&#8217;Reilly and the drug abuse of Rush Limbaugh. These people preached &#8220;moral values&#8221; to other people and talk about the precious institution of marriage. But then they do immoral acts. They are all hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John-david Morgan</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>John-david Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 15:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-652</guid>
		<description>Jeff:  I would welcome with open arms any opportunity to talk, discuss, debate the merits of the Milwaukee Parental Choice program. Feel free to read our recent posts it. 

But, if you've been paying any attention these last 11 years or so, that's not what we get from Charlie Sykes. That's not what we get from Mikel Holt. That's never what we got from Mayor John Norquist; from Tommy Thompson; from so-called "reformers" such as Leah Vukmir.  Ask Alan Brown, former superintendent of MPS, whether the choice crowd likes to make personal attacks or whether they want to talk about the issues at hand. 

These "choice" reformers, education hucksters, have pushed the Milwaukee Choice program as though it were a jerry-rigged car that's supposed to replace the car you have (MPS) that has been having some mechanical troubles:  

They tell you they have a new and better car for you.  
You say, "OK, let me look at it."
They say, "Here it is."
You say, "Alright, can we go to a mechanic and get a diagnostic so I can see if if's up to standard."
They say, "That's out of the question."
You say, "Well, I dunno, maybe I'll pass."
They say, "But your car doesn't have any wheels and it's running at 20 percent efficiency."
You say, "What are you talking about. There are four wheels (I do need a new tire), and it's running at 70 percent efficiency."
They say, "The Journal Sentinel and Charlie Sykes are reporting that your car has no wheels and is running at 20 percent."
You say, "They're crazy, it just needs some maintenance."
They say, "Teachers union."
You say, "What?"
They say, "You heard me: Teachers union.  What about those union dues?"
You say, "You're crazy, let's look under the hood, the teachers union isn't running this car."
They say, "No can do -- this is a civil rights issue."

And you wonder why Lena Taylor was in tears yesterday on the state Senate floor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff:  I would welcome with open arms any opportunity to talk, discuss, debate the merits of the Milwaukee Parental Choice program. Feel free to read our recent posts it. </p>
<p>But, if you&#8217;ve been paying any attention these last 11 years or so, that&#8217;s not what we get from Charlie Sykes. That&#8217;s not what we get from Mikel Holt. That&#8217;s never what we got from Mayor John Norquist; from Tommy Thompson; from so-called &#8220;reformers&#8221; such as Leah Vukmir.  Ask Alan Brown, former superintendent of MPS, whether the choice crowd likes to make personal attacks or whether they want to talk about the issues at hand. </p>
<p>These &#8220;choice&#8221; reformers, education hucksters, have pushed the Milwaukee Choice program as though it were a jerry-rigged car that&#8217;s supposed to replace the car you have (MPS) that has been having some mechanical troubles:  </p>
<p>They tell you they have a new and better car for you.<br />
You say, &#8220;OK, let me look at it.&#8221;<br />
They say, &#8220;Here it is.&#8221;<br />
You say, &#8220;Alright, can we go to a mechanic and get a diagnostic so I can see if if&#8217;s up to standard.&#8221;<br />
They say, &#8220;That&#8217;s out of the question.&#8221;<br />
You say, &#8220;Well, I dunno, maybe I&#8217;ll pass.&#8221;<br />
They say, &#8220;But your car doesn&#8217;t have any wheels and it&#8217;s running at 20 percent efficiency.&#8221;<br />
You say, &#8220;What are you talking about. There are four wheels (I do need a new tire), and it&#8217;s running at 70 percent efficiency.&#8221;<br />
They say, &#8220;The Journal Sentinel and Charlie Sykes are reporting that your car has no wheels and is running at 20 percent.&#8221;<br />
You say, &#8220;They&#8217;re crazy, it just needs some maintenance.&#8221;<br />
They say, &#8220;Teachers union.&#8221;<br />
You say, &#8220;What?&#8221;<br />
They say, &#8220;You heard me: Teachers union.  What about those union dues?&#8221;<br />
You say, &#8220;You&#8217;re crazy, let&#8217;s look under the hood, the teachers union isn&#8217;t running this car.&#8221;<br />
They say, &#8220;No can do &#8212; this is a civil rights issue.&#8221;</p>
<p>And you wonder why Lena Taylor was in tears yesterday on the state Senate floor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim McGuigan</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim McGuigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-650</guid>
		<description>I have no idea what your school choice rant has to do with Charlie Sykes' adulterous affair.

Sykes' bedroom antics become fair play when he chooses to question the morality of others.  He's chosen to cast the first stone so he must believe himself to be without moral problems of his own.

I was simply pointing out his hypocricy.

After all, he's complaining about the AG driving drunk while trying to uphold the law, doesn't it make sense for someone to question Sykes talking about morality as he diddled with someone on the side? 

For that matter, why doesn't anyone on the right care?
 
By the way, I see you're trying to minimize his indiscretion but it wasn't just his wife that was hurt by his actions -- it was his children also.  No good father could possibly excuse Sykes' actions.  Why aren't you condemning them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea what your school choice rant has to do with Charlie Sykes&#8217; adulterous affair.</p>
<p>Sykes&#8217; bedroom antics become fair play when he chooses to question the morality of others.  He&#8217;s chosen to cast the first stone so he must believe himself to be without moral problems of his own.</p>
<p>I was simply pointing out his hypocricy.</p>
<p>After all, he&#8217;s complaining about the AG driving drunk while trying to uphold the law, doesn&#8217;t it make sense for someone to question Sykes talking about morality as he diddled with someone on the side? </p>
<p>For that matter, why doesn&#8217;t anyone on the right care?</p>
<p>By the way, I see you&#8217;re trying to minimize his indiscretion but it wasn&#8217;t just his wife that was hurt by his actions &#8212; it was his children also.  No good father could possibly excuse Sykes&#8217; actions.  Why aren&#8217;t you condemning them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Wilhelm</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Wilhelm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 16:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-649</guid>
		<description>To the "Watch Dog" 
  We are so lucky to have someone who is so morally pure such yourself looking out for us oh great watchdog. In your explanation to us of who you are "honor, integrity, and fidelity are key to who I am", you obviously left out "humble".It is so like you liberals to personally attack and name call but lets not debate the issues on their merits. Somehow school choice goes against your "honor &#038; integrity" because Charlie Sykes is an adulterer. Do you really want to go down that path, because your side would lose. If your really such a "watchdog" why don't you get out of Charlie Sykes bedroom and start exposing the politically "immoral" pay for play politicians that run our city and state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the &#8220;Watch Dog&#8221;<br />
  We are so lucky to have someone who is so morally pure such yourself looking out for us oh great watchdog. In your explanation to us of who you are &#8220;honor, integrity, and fidelity are key to who I am&#8221;, you obviously left out &#8220;humble&#8221;.It is so like you liberals to personally attack and name call but lets not debate the issues on their merits. Somehow school choice goes against your &#8220;honor &#038; integrity&#8221; because Charlie Sykes is an adulterer. Do you really want to go down that path, because your side would lose. If your really such a &#8220;watchdog&#8221; why don&#8217;t you get out of Charlie Sykes bedroom and start exposing the politically &#8220;immoral&#8221; pay for play politicians that run our city and state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John-david Morgan</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>John-david Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/jim/2006/charlie-sykes-adulterer-coward-vindictive-republican-shill/#comment-546</guid>
		<description>For the record, I'm not that intersted in Charlie Sykes's love life; as of late, this ad of his and Mikel Holt's with the kids from Messmer saying some fairly reprehensible things about governor Doyle is a new low, even for Charlie.

But do keep Jim's post in mind the next time Charlie starts spouting off on the air about how legitimate the GOP's insidious "Defense of Marriage Act" is.  Is there anybody in Wisconsin who would want Charlie standing up for their marriage?  

Yikes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I&#8217;m not that intersted in Charlie Sykes&#8217;s love life; as of late, this ad of his and Mikel Holt&#8217;s with the kids from Messmer saying some fairly reprehensible things about governor Doyle is a new low, even for Charlie.</p>
<p>But do keep Jim&#8217;s post in mind the next time Charlie starts spouting off on the air about how legitimate the GOP&#8217;s insidious &#8220;Defense of Marriage Act&#8221; is.  Is there anybody in Wisconsin who would want Charlie standing up for their marriage?  </p>
<p>Yikes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
