Only a moron would scam his campaign for chump change like this and only an idiot would invite such unwanted attention.

Dohnal has published on a bunch of blogs a false claim about Sullivan that he knew was false 5 years before and is clearly a case of mistaken identity. Knowingly disseminating false information with the express purpose of influencing an election is a civil forfeiture.

Priceless!

Campaign finance reports do not work like tax reports for a business owner. If you have a home business, you can claim a portion of your energy and phone bills as a legit business expense. At-home energy costs as a campaign expense is a no-no.

Obviously, you guys are using the Reynolds print shop to run lit for the campaign, but why would you claim an energy cost as an itemized campaign expense? Energy is a legit business overhead and would naturally be included in what the print shop bills the campaign, the same way Reynolds bills other clients. It is just part of the cost of printing. If in fact you meant to itemize the energy cost of printing, why would you even do so? And why offer it as an explanation or excuse, when it is a campaign finance violation all the same?

I can\’t decide whether you guys are crooked or stupid.

By the way, is the Reynolds campaign now paying J.J. Blonien for the campaign work he does for Reynolds? Or are state taxpayers still paying that?

If taxpayeres are still paying for Blonien, Reynolds is a crook.

– Reynolds camp can\’t get its story straight on utility charges –
http://www.milwaukeerising.blogspot.com/
(scroll down to her October 15 post)

Or is it similar to photos that Reynolds is using in his own literature, used to make it look like any other piece of Reynolds literature?