2
August
2007

Let’s not forget why Deputies don’t have the enhanced pension benefits

seal.jpgThe question has been asked and it’s time to let everyone know why deputies never received the enhanced pension benefit that other Milwaukee County Employees received.

Here’s what happened.

Their union President at the time organized a bunch of deputies to oppose the contract that the county was offering. Why? The answer came back that it just wasn’t good enough.

The county had offered everything. Even the backdrop benefit which we know now, but didn’t know then, was more lucrative and unaffordable than was previously thought, was in the package. Deputies would continue to get a 2% multiplier. What that means is this — when a deputy who is with the department at least 5 or 10 years has years of service plus their age that total 75, they can retire. Note: Deputies hired after 1994 have the rule of 85. When they retire, they will get 2% per year of their average salary (calculated over a 3 year period) for the rest of their life. (More senior deputies had a 2.5% multiplier.)

So a deputy hired prior to 1994 who joined the department at age 29 could retire when the were 52 (33 years of service plus age 52 = 75). Their pension would be 33 years x 2% per year, or 66% of their final salary. There is no profit sharing plan in Milwaukee County government.

Sheriff-badge.jpgSo what happened? The deputies wanted the enhanced benefit plus another 0.5% added on to their multiplier and they were unconcerned about the starting pay for deputies. That meant that the old timers would be brought up to a whopping 3% had we given them everything they wanted!

That was a deal killer for me when I sat on the Personnel committee.

My previous aide had left to become a deputy. Starting pay was $26,000 per year and took quite a while before it started to rise. Veteran deputies made an impressive salary but all of the perks the union was pushing seemed to be at the expense of the new guys. The Deputy Sheriff’s Association was happy to sit down at the table and offer up the work of their young so it could benefit their old. It completely defied the entire concept of what a union is supposed to do. Union brothers and sisters? As I saw it, that was a twisted brother and sister relationship.

But there was another problem.

After Milwaukee County would go through the expense of training deputies, they would leave to take jobs in other departments — some starting as low as $30,000. So consider what the benefits were to a new deputy. Take a job making less than you could make if you left and if you choose to stay, you know your only assignment will be in the jail as a guard where your life will be in danger and you will be sworn at, spit at and even have feces thrown at you.

Sound like an attractive job?

I didn’t think so. Apparently my Aide didn’t think so either because he left the Sheriff’s Department to take a more lucrative job in law enforcement after less than a year.

So I’ll admit it. I’m the guy. Blame me for pushing for deputies to have a starting salary of $30,000. Yep, I’m the guy who held up the deputy package in the personnel committee and pulled my colleagues along. I’m the guy, who in closed meetings, said that I would never vote for a package for the deputies that had a starting salary of less than $30,000

It could be paid for by saying no to the extra 0.5% in the multiplier. After all, the deputies already got 0.5% more than other county employees so what were these old guys who were in charge of the union whining about?

Well our offer went to the deputies and guess what? They said no. It had everything but the 0.5% and they shot it down. Why? It was because their union President, Geoff Bilda was busy working to kill it. Bilda didn’t think it was a good enough plan for the deputies. Yep, Bilda who had many years in already and wanted a 3% multiplier, didn’t think his 2.5% was enough. Let’s face it, it was a great plan for the deputies because it had enhanced benefits and it wasn’t paid for by screwing the new recruits.

By increasing the starting pay, deputies stopped fleeing their jobs as soon as their training was done. That saved Milwaukee County a lot of money.

It was never our intention to make veteran deputies wealthy but had they approved that contract, many of those old timers who opposed the contract would have gotten the backdrop benefit which got so much publicity. They would have been rewarded handsomely even though those of us on the other side of the table were told by our staff that this was a very affordable benefit and no one would get rich on it.

So you see the irony here?

Interestingly enough, Bilda came to a Judiciary meeting to publicly complain about how Milwaukee County wasn’t negotiating in good faith on the contract and demanded that we get back to the negotiating table. What a mistake that was. You see, I was the Chairman of the Judiciary committee. From the Chairman’s seat I asked him if he was the same Geoff Bilda who worked to kill the County’s offer. Was this the same Geoff Bilda who was pushing for higher pay for senior deputies and lower pay for rookies? Bilda didn’t take too kindly to that but that was really the start of the fall of Geoff Bilda. The next union election saw him tossed out on his ear.

And that’s why deputies don’t have, nor ever did have, the backdrop benefit.

5 Comments

  1. Deputy Insider:

    Jim, I have to say I believe you are incorrect on the rule of 75 being involved in that contract. The rule of 75 was removed for anyone hired after Jan,1 1994, so says my contract. I have yet to hear of an offer where the county would give something for nothing, so what would have had to been given up for the rule of 75 to be brought back? I was told, and I can only go by what I was told, is that the .5% was to bring the deputies that were at 2% up to 2.5% bringing all deputies to 2.5%. Deputies, I believe are the only group have to work 10 years just to qualify for the minimum pension program - without the rule of 75 for 80% of current employees. Our elder deputies controlled most of the vote based on misinformation. Since I’ve been with the county I’ve seen deputies lose the rule of 75, top 3 years towards the pension, .5% towards said pension, longevity pay and health care after retirement. I’ve watched a 5 step pay scale reach 14 steps, that’s equal to 14 years of work folks. To top that off I’m not 100% sure how or when those were lost since the contract negotiations were hidden like gold. Sure we have a higher starting pay NOW…but we AREN’T HIRING either.

    I KNOW our board uses misinformation to control votes. It happens every contract. So don’t paint the deputies as being money mongers and I won’t blast the board for their prompt pay increases. Deal?

  2. Jim McGuigan:

    Deputy,
    I believe you had the rule of 75 but your union may have negotiated that away. But you’re definitely wrong about the multiplier. Senior deputies who opposed the plan and were more concerned about pulling themselves up to the trough than taking care of the young guys, would have also gotten an extra 0.5% had we given the deputies everything they wanted. The comment, “why should we vote for it when there’s nothing in it for us” came from several seasoned deputies.

    I’m not painting all deputies as being money grubbers but I don’t have any problem painting association leaders at that time, or at least their motivations during that contract negotiating session, that way.

    You can paint the board any way you choose but unlike deputies who get a raise every year, Supervisors haven’t had a raise since 2000. If you think 7 years is prompt, then I think we know why the deputies didn’t think what was being offered was a fair offer. Besides, Supervisors can’t vote themselves a raise — they can vote for a raise for the next elected board. If they win their position they can get a raise. There are differences in the jobs.

    Would you suggest that deputies, like Supervisors, be fired and have to apply for their jobs every four years just like Supervisors? Should deputies have to raise half of their annual salary from friends and family in order to make it possible to get their jobs back? I ask because that’s pretty much what a Supervisor has to do.

  3. Deputy Insider:

    Jim,
    I said I can only go on what I was told about the %. I new from day one, Hilman protected his elder deputies with contracts that were for them and not future deputies.

    I ask you would you have rather been a deputy? You know, work the holidays and weekends, seeing your family in between naps and overtime maybe making it to a few family functions a year due to the work schedule. Deal with people that are certainly unhappy to see you, even attack you, both physically and mentally. Know any day you leave for work could be your last, not to mention your spouse maybe in the field too and face them same stress everyday. Get shot working courts or jumped and beaten to an inch of your life working the jail, hit by a car and thrust into a coma on patrol… yeah I see your point…should’ve been a supervisor.

  4. Matt:

    33 plus 52 equals 85.

    52 minus 29 equals 23.

    Might want to fix that before people start in on you.

  5. Jim McGuigan:

    Deputy,
    I fear that you’re taking this a bit too personal. Let me point out that I’ve made efforts in this blog to make sure that deputies get a fair shake. It is clear that Clarke has dropped his trousers to take a dump on his own deputies as often as possible and that’s just not right.

    To be sure, a law enforcement schedule sucks. My gripe is not with the majority of hard working men and women in the department but with the way that one issue was handled. I considered becoming a deputy and was even offered the job a few years back but declined because of the low starting pay and the fact that I would have been on jail assignment for five years.

    So please, don’t mistake my honest explaination for why deputies don’t have the benefits they could have, for a disrespect of our men and women who keep our community safe. I have a deep respect for every single deputy out there.

Leave a comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

Watchdog Milwaukee is a division of Midwest Deals LLC

Rodney's Adsense-Deluxe Add ons plugged in.
Using Yaletown Theme for Wordpress.

Progressive Webmasters of Wisconsin

Next

Random

List