December
2005
After flip-flopping, playing war opportunist, Kerry asks for $
Many political watchers were appalled this morning to find a letter, penned by former Senator Gary Hart, from johnkerry.com, in which Hart disgracefully lauds Kerry for his new stance on the Iraq war. At the end of the letter, Kerry adds to the disgrace by asking for a contribution.
More disturbingly, and in keeping with a now puzzling trend in national Democratic rhetoric, including MoveOn.org, there is no mention of Russ Feingold, who, along with Barbara Boxer, Robert Byrd and other senators, have never wavered in their opposition to the Bush-Cheney war strategy.
The letter is causing a firestorm of outrage among many who have followed the course of the war debate since Russ Feingold first introduced an Iraq exit strategy in June. Here’s the full text of the letter:
Dear [name],
“The public trust must be earned, and speaking clearly, candidly and forcefully now about the mess in Iraq is the place to begin.”I wrote those words in August in The Washington Post to call on Democratic Party leaders to step forward on Iraq. My years in the Senate and as co-chair of the Bipartisan Commission on National Security had convinced me that, unless Democrats provided real leadership, Americans would never receive the honest and open debate about Iraq that our country deserves.
When I first read John Kerry’s October speech on Iraq, I knew it was a turning point. He spoke with the same unwavering voice - truth speaking to power - as he did when I first heard him speak out about the war in Vietnam in 1971. John Kerry got it right last month when he said, “Asking tough questions isn’t pessimism; it’s patriotism” and then answered those questions by offering a detailed plan to get the troops home.
In recent weeks, Democratic leaders across America - Jack Murtha, Ted Kennedy, Joe Biden, Pat Leahy, John Edwards and Barack Obama - have questioned the Bush Administration’s unfocused “stay as long as it takes” approach. Democrats have joined together to offer substantive alternatives to get it right in Iraq and made it clear that our conscience and conviction lie with taking care of our troops.
The grassroots community at johnkerry.com has played a critical role making sure these ideas are heard and that brave Democrats are protected against the inevitable Republican attacks.
When John Kerry called for the withdrawal of 20,000 troops over the holidays, and the majority of remaining combat troops by the end of 2006, linking bringing troops home to clear benchmarks, you added energy and passion to that initiative.
When John Kerry called for accelerated training of Iraqi troops, greater international involvement, and improved reconstruction efforts, you amplified his voice.Now, because of your efforts and those of all these Democratic leaders, make no mistake: the wheel has turned in the national debate over the war in Iraq. The American people have responded to the tough questions we’ve been asking because they had the same ones. The result is that the Bush Administration is being forced to engage in something they’ve gone to great lengths to avoid: an open debate about the war in Iraq.
We should all be proud of what has been accomplished, but never complacent. Asking questions and debating the issues alone will not rectify this disastrous situation exacerbated by the endless stream of Administration failures. You have to demand answers. You have to demand results for our troops.
That means making sure the intensity of your grassroots effort doesn’t fade over the holidays. Our troops don’t have the luxury of taking it easy over the holidays, and neither do we.
We have to continue to speak out - on talk radio, in letters to the editor, and to our neighbors - to demand an Administration strategy to get our troops home.This fight isn’t just about the future of the Democratic Party - whether we’re going to have a strong Democratic Party that speaks its mind or settles for being a second Republican Party. This fight, at its core, is about restoring the strength and honor of America.
America needs your continued leadership, courage and passion on the grassroots level. I can’t thank you enough for everything you have already done, and I am confident about what the johnkerry.com community is sure to accomplish in the future.
Sincerely,
Gary Hart[Make a contribution link here]
Paid for by Friends of John Kerry, Inc.
John-david Morgan
John-David Morgan
RSS feed
Link
Bravo,
Mr. Hart should get back to bizness on “the Monkey Business” as he is best suited for that sort of “work”. As for Mr. Kerry, that stiff blowhard never met an opportunity he didn’t leap at. Check the wind with your finger again Kerry, you should’ve had the ‘nads to speak out like this on 2004! Too little too late!
The letter from Hart sparked the following response from a Milwaukeean who used to live in Colorado and was once a constituent of Hart’s. It was sent to info@johnkerry.com Thursday.
“As a former Coloradan, I have long had a great admiration for Gary Hart, but shilling for John Kerry is a disapointing development. Contributions indeed! Kerry didn’t even spend a great portion of the money that WE donated to his losing campaign. His initial support for a war that was seen as a sham from those of us who’ve never been gullible enough to believe the Cheney administration, casts doubts upon his much ballyhooed ‘intellect.’
His half-baked Johnny-come-lately critiques over the last month, his careful attempts to not too closely resemble (fellow veteran!!) John Murtha’s call, his obnoxious pretensions of a ‘do over’ White House run, and his call for troop reductions three months after the American people called for it, SIX months after Russ Feingold set the FIRST timetable (ignored) in the Senate (or the House for that matter) compels me to update my old senator from the land of the Aspens and Colombines: I now have a new senator who also happens to be the new future of the Democratic Party. His name is Russell Feingold.”
Sincerely,
Tim Cook
Milwaukee, WI
“[...] since Russ Feingold first introduced an Iraq exit strategy in June.”
I must’ve missed the “strategy” part. All Feingold did was set an arbitrary date of 12/31/06 for troop withdrawal. Even if he stated it was partial, measured, unilateral, etc… It doesn’t amount to a strategy.
Amateurs talk strategy, professionals talk logistics…
Withdrawal is a strategy, as is the general idea of removing the burden of this war from the people of Iraq and refocusing it on the “islamic extremists” that Gen. Azibaid says he’s fighting “the long war” against.
Feingold was also one of the 12 sponsors of the more specific bill that received 40 votes but was voted down by the GOP in the Senate.
If there was to be talk, or debate, in the Democratic Primary, Kerry the professional politician, would hit the canvas hard and fast. Hillary would hammer him from the right, Feingold would put him to shame from the left. While that sounds like good bloodsport, I’d hate to see it. I hope Kerry has the good sense to stay out of the race, despite all evidence to the contrary.
We all hope Kerry stays out of the race. America deserves better than that meely-mouthed careerist. Feingold may be a careerist, too, but at least he brings intelligence to a debate…
Sue Moe says “amateurs talk strategy professionals talk logisistics” What professionals is she referring to? The Bush administration? Professionals wouldn’t have misled us into this disatrous war. Moreover, a legislator’s job is not to devise “a strategy” to get us out of a bad situation. This is akin to you borrowing my car against my advice not to - under some misleading story that you have no other way home - and then crashing it into another car. Now it is somehow my responsibility to come up with a “strategy” to get you (us?) out of a mess you created!!
Feingold is acting in his capacity as a Senate leader in proposing that we address the need to get out of Iraq at some point. Few others have had the courage to do so. We await George Bush’s stratgey to get us out of the wrecked car that is Iraq…..
In Specific, here’s what Feingold proposed:
.. “a policy on Iraq that includes a flexible timetable for completing our military mission there, so that we can focus on our national security priority – defeating the global terrorist networks that threaten the U.S.”