<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Most Important Vote to Cast Today Is &#8216;NO&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/</link>
	<description>Your Progressive Source for Local Opinions and Insightful Commentary</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Stocks</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/#comment-6918</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Stocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 16:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/#comment-6918</guid>
		<description>Furthermore, even though I voted YES, the fact that the ad used children is wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Furthermore, even though I voted YES, the fact that the ad used children is wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Stocks</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/#comment-6917</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Stocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 15:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/#comment-6917</guid>
		<description>James - The sanctity of marriage is being "crapped" on by more than just homosexuals and lesbians.  There are straight men and women in marriage who are having affairs and engaging in wife-swapping, etc..  I personally voted YES, because it is MY whole-hearted belief that marriage should be between a man and a woman.  That being said, I don't think anyone at all should be stripped of their rights to health care and/or benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James - The sanctity of marriage is being &#8220;crapped&#8221; on by more than just homosexuals and lesbians.  There are straight men and women in marriage who are having affairs and engaging in wife-swapping, etc..  I personally voted YES, because it is MY whole-hearted belief that marriage should be between a man and a woman.  That being said, I don&#8217;t think anyone at all should be stripped of their rights to health care and/or benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John-david Morgan</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/#comment-6906</link>
		<dc:creator>John-david Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 23:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/#comment-6906</guid>
		<description>Now, now, James, you know damn well that if Wisconsin conservatives and the Family Research Institute wanted to preserve the sanctity of marriage, all they had to do was delete the following clause: "and that a legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized in this state?"

Had that happened, there would have been no outcry, health benefits would not be threatened, and we would not be having this conversation right now.

Unfortunately, that's not what happened, is it James?  

Calling me despicable doesn't change the reality that this so-called marriage amendment was intentionally hurtful to citizens of the state, that it created an indsidious conversation about marriage and privacy that should never have occured, or that it is a direct affront to the state constitution, the common law and the common good -- not to mention the intelligence of all involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, now, James, you know damn well that if Wisconsin conservatives and the Family Research Institute wanted to preserve the sanctity of marriage, all they had to do was delete the following clause: &#8220;and that a legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized in this state?&#8221;</p>
<p>Had that happened, there would have been no outcry, health benefits would not be threatened, and we would not be having this conversation right now.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, that&#8217;s not what happened, is it James?  </p>
<p>Calling me despicable doesn&#8217;t change the reality that this so-called marriage amendment was intentionally hurtful to citizens of the state, that it created an indsidious conversation about marriage and privacy that should never have occured, or that it is a direct affront to the state constitution, the common law and the common good &#8212; not to mention the intelligence of all involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/#comment-6905</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 22:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/#comment-6905</guid>
		<description>John - 

You are crapping all over the sanctitiy of marriage.  No matter how hard you try, you can not change something that is not natural into something that is.  It brings nothing but destruction to a couples life. There is only one way to reproduce, and that is for a reason. People should not be denied health care for any reason, and that IS a seperate issue, but to promote something that is destructive to the preservation of mankind is despicable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John - </p>
<p>You are crapping all over the sanctitiy of marriage.  No matter how hard you try, you can not change something that is not natural into something that is.  It brings nothing but destruction to a couples life. There is only one way to reproduce, and that is for a reason. People should not be denied health care for any reason, and that IS a seperate issue, but to promote something that is destructive to the preservation of mankind is despicable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John-david Morgan</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/#comment-6903</link>
		<dc:creator>John-david Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 20:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/#comment-6903</guid>
		<description>If the patient is in a coma, Sally. You are nitpicking. There are all sorts of situations where other family members can potentially step in and deny the decision making role of a gay partner, even in picking a child up from school.

Despicable is the GOP national scheme to make this an issue to press the buttons of voters -- though whether or not these referendums help Republicans at the polls is debatable. 

Despicable are repeated lies throughout this process from both Mark Gundrum (R-New Berlin) and Scott Fitzgerald, the cosponsors of the insidious marriage amendment. 

If the amendment is defeated they said, the door will be open for courts to make gay marriage legal in Wisconsin. FALSE.

The New Jersey courts, they said, consecrated gay marriage in their decision last month. FALSE.

No one in the U.S. has lost health care benefits because of a marriage amendment, they said. FALSE. It happened to state of Michigan employees. And to say this after Gundrum, Fitz, et al, voted to deny an extension of health benefits to UW-System employees with legal partnerships, affecting both gay and straight couples 

Wake up. Marriage is under attack in all this, but not from gay couples or from Fair Wisconsin. Throughout the history of Wisconsin, the state constitution has been used to extend protections to citizens. With the marriage amendment, for the first time the constitution will be used to remove and prevent civil union and partnership protections of thousands of couples, gay and straight. 

Despicable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the patient is in a coma, Sally. You are nitpicking. There are all sorts of situations where other family members can potentially step in and deny the decision making role of a gay partner, even in picking a child up from school.</p>
<p>Despicable is the GOP national scheme to make this an issue to press the buttons of voters &#8212; though whether or not these referendums help Republicans at the polls is debatable. </p>
<p>Despicable are repeated lies throughout this process from both Mark Gundrum (R-New Berlin) and Scott Fitzgerald, the cosponsors of the insidious marriage amendment. </p>
<p>If the amendment is defeated they said, the door will be open for courts to make gay marriage legal in Wisconsin. FALSE.</p>
<p>The New Jersey courts, they said, consecrated gay marriage in their decision last month. FALSE.</p>
<p>No one in the U.S. has lost health care benefits because of a marriage amendment, they said. FALSE. It happened to state of Michigan employees. And to say this after Gundrum, Fitz, et al, voted to deny an extension of health benefits to UW-System employees with legal partnerships, affecting both gay and straight couples </p>
<p>Wake up. Marriage is under attack in all this, but not from gay couples or from Fair Wisconsin. Throughout the history of Wisconsin, the state constitution has been used to extend protections to citizens. With the marriage amendment, for the first time the constitution will be used to remove and prevent civil union and partnership protections of thousands of couples, gay and straight. </p>
<p>Despicable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sally</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/#comment-6898</link>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/#comment-6898</guid>
		<description>under hippa federal law, a patient may make anyone their health care power of attorney, even their gay partner.

Fair Wisconsin argument regarding health care is incorrect.

You simply sign a legal health care poa, and give the hospital permission to consult with that person.
Also, phone calls made by Fair Wis. to intentionally deceive and mislead voters day before election were despicable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>under hippa federal law, a patient may make anyone their health care power of attorney, even their gay partner.</p>
<p>Fair Wisconsin argument regarding health care is incorrect.</p>
<p>You simply sign a legal health care poa, and give the hospital permission to consult with that person.<br />
Also, phone calls made by Fair Wis. to intentionally deceive and mislead voters day before election were despicable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John-david Morgan</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/#comment-6889</link>
		<dc:creator>John-david Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 07:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/#comment-6889</guid>
		<description>Paid actors? Apparently they didn't want to taint real children from real families with this pernicious amendment.

I thought Wisconsin would do better with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paid actors? Apparently they didn&#8217;t want to taint real children from real families with this pernicious amendment.</p>
<p>I thought Wisconsin would do better with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/#comment-6884</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 20:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/#comment-6884</guid>
		<description>I voted NO

and just an FYI, while Fair WI adds used volunteers or ordinary wisconsinites on the street (who gave permission), the adds the pro amendment people ran used paid actors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I voted NO</p>
<p>and just an FYI, while Fair WI adds used volunteers or ordinary wisconsinites on the street (who gave permission), the adds the pro amendment people ran used paid actors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Ryan</title>
		<link>http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/#comment-6877</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdogmilwaukee.com/blog/john-david-morgan/2006/the-most-important-vote-to-cast-today-is-no/#comment-6877</guid>
		<description>I proudly voted "no" against this pointless wedge issue this morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I proudly voted &#8220;no&#8221; against this pointless wedge issue this morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
